Author Topic: How accurate is your 5001, 5002 or 5004?  (Read 2978 times)

Offline lilpronaz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
How accurate is your 5001, 5002 or 5004?
« on: December 26, 2009, 03:28:41 PM »
I have been monitoring my BP for the past 4 weeks (factoring the break-in period for the movement) after reading a lot about the inaccuracy of the 51011 and 51111 movements in the past. Sad to say, the critisism on the BP's accuracy is spot on after observing an approx. +7s/day on my piece. Not that I am anal about accuracy but I would expect much more from IWC since my 3717 is keeping time within +1s to +2s per day. Furthermore, the price we pay for 5001 or 5004 warrants a movement that is comparable to the accuracy of ETA based movements.

Perhaps I have to start placing the BP in different positions when I am not wearing it to negate the time gained. So here comes the question...how accurate are your in-house IWC pieces?

This is a quick and dirty belated shot of the big one.




Offline sshark

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: How accurate is your 5001, 5002 or 5004?
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2009, 03:53:09 PM »
When measuring the 5000 series, one has to take in the Power Reserve factor. My observation for my 5004 at high power reserve (5 days onwards) my 5004 varies between 1~5s / day. Mostly 1-2s. Whereas on the lower end (less than 2days PR) it varies between 5~8s / day. I am please with these results (even compared to my Sub with daily 2s deviation) though I am those who are "concerned" about accuracy.



« Last Edit: December 26, 2009, 04:01:06 PM by sshark »

Offline lilpronaz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: How accurate is your 5001, 5002 or 5004?
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2009, 04:04:02 PM »
You must be one of the lucky ones with better accuracy. I am getting around +7s/day despite the PR showing 5-7 days (dial up most of the time - computer work :D).

I was reading complaints in another forum where owners of 5001 and 5004 are generally getting around +10s/day to +15s/day. This is definately not acceptable IMO.

I suppose the best workaround is to identify the gain/loss for each of the 5 positions and place the watch accordingly when not wearing to fix the gain/loss when wearing the watch. Not an ideal solution but nevertheless, it works.

Offline sshark

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: How accurate is your 5001, 5002 or 5004?
« Reply #3 on: December 26, 2009, 04:13:03 PM »
Now that you mention a lot of computer work. Have you check for magnetism? My notebook speaker is very near my wrist and my past ignorance has caused my watches to be magnetized.



I suppose the best workaround is to identify the gain/loss for each of the 5 positions and place the watch accordingly when not wearing to fix the gain/loss when wearing the watch. Not an ideal solution but nevertheless, it works.
In fact this was mentioned Rolex warranty manual.


Offline lilpronaz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: How accurate is your 5001, 5002 or 5004?
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2009, 04:40:04 PM »
Hmm...the 5004 comes with soft-iron core. Is the computer speaker magnet strong enough to affect the BP? Anyone?

Offline sshark

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: How accurate is your 5001, 5002 or 5004?
« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2009, 04:54:27 PM »
FYI, the soft-iron in BP protects the watch from magnetic flux density up to 32k A/m compared to 80k A/m for Milgauss and Ingeniuer.