Author Topic: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?  (Read 21838 times)

Offline terrenceterrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
    • scrapsofmylife
Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« on: March 28, 2011, 10:06:42 AM »
was surfing around and trying to understand all the variations of speedies and stumbled upon this particular model.

this model is a reissue of the first generation speedy from 57-59. although it shares the same 1861 cal. as most speedies, somehow the re-sale prices are way lower comparatively. is there really no love for this model?

looks real cool and seriously thinking maybe this would be my first omega if i decides to get one from the brand. a bargain to be had?







« Last Edit: March 28, 2011, 10:13:22 AM by terrenceterrence »
Better outrun my gun....faster than my bullet


Offline duke916sps

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2011, 10:18:40 AM »
I think there's a cream white dial with leather strap variation as well.

Offline hanz079

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
  • I is Rocks!!
    • WATCHIONABLE
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2011, 10:35:45 AM »
Yeah, I would love an answer for that as well.
Selling pre-owned is lower. Did not dare to pull the trigger coz no research at all...  :HammerHead:
All I know is I saw one brand new in my Local ADs place retail at 17k.
It's called the moonwatch replica in some circles ???
Maybe some sifus here (Mr.Hobbit? Manburg? CK?) can clear up some misconceptions about this piece and the why and how and whatnots?  ;D
« Last Edit: March 28, 2011, 10:43:58 AM by hanz079 »
Terrenceterrence "seriously, i think buying a watch for it's secondhand value is like getting married and thinking about divorce at the back of your mind."


watchionable.blogspot.com

Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2011, 12:27:47 PM »
Not a sifu but I would like to share.

For some reason, Omega called this model as Broad Arrow 1957 'Replica' instead of reissue  :HammerHead:

They came on a bracelet (3594.50.00) and on a strap (3894.xx.xx). For the cream Broad Arrow, it is the later prodcution which fitted caliber 3313 movement.

Why that is less demand on this model?
I don't know, maybe it is due to the over popularity of the moonwatch (3570) than this 'replica'.
The other issue the silver hands, it will would completely disappear in bright light and making it hard to tell the time.


Offline hanz079

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
  • I is Rocks!!
    • WATCHIONABLE
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2011, 12:37:19 PM »
Did this version of the speedy gone to the moon?
Terrenceterrence "seriously, i think buying a watch for it's secondhand value is like getting married and thinking about divorce at the back of your mind."


watchionable.blogspot.com

Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2011, 12:47:53 PM »
Did this version of the speedy gone to the moon?
This 'replica'? No, this model only lauched in 90s.
www.chronomaddox.com/moonmovement.html

Offline hanz079

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
  • I is Rocks!!
    • WATCHIONABLE
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2011, 12:55:48 PM »
Did this version of the speedy gone to the moon?
This 'replica'? No, this model only lauched in 90s.
www.chronomaddox.com/moonmovement.html
I mean the 1957 version.
Note: After reading the link... I guess not...
Why is it called the moonwatch replica then?
« Last Edit: March 28, 2011, 01:00:29 PM by hanz079 »
Terrenceterrence "seriously, i think buying a watch for it's secondhand value is like getting married and thinking about divorce at the back of your mind."


watchionable.blogspot.com

Offline terrenceterrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
    • scrapsofmylife
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2011, 01:00:05 PM »
the 1957 is a pre-moonwatch model.

or u can say the daddy of the moonwatch  :laugh:

but i do believe it offers a great value for money being the same cal. special edition box and relative "scarcity" (just that you'll less likely to see one on another person's wrist).

Better outrun my gun....faster than my bullet


Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2011, 01:03:24 PM »
@hanz, this model is supposed to be the 'replica' of the 1957 original version.

@terrence, ya something different from normal moonwatch: sunken subdials, applied logo.

Offline hanz079

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
  • I is Rocks!!
    • WATCHIONABLE
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2011, 01:07:05 PM »
Oooohhh... DADDY of the moonwatch? I like that... ;D
Wear this and see someone wearing a moonwatch? Ask him... who's yer daddy?  :Laughing_on_floor:
Terrenceterrence "seriously, i think buying a watch for it's secondhand value is like getting married and thinking about divorce at the back of your mind."


watchionable.blogspot.com

Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2011, 01:10:55 PM »
Oooohhh... DADDY of the moonwatch? I like that... ;D
Wear this and see someone wearing a moonwatch? Ask him... who's yer daddy?  :Laughing_on_floor:
This is just a pretender la  :Laughing_on_floor:
Go and get a real deal, i.e. ref CK2915, CK2998  :Dancing_banana:

Offline Scott C.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2345
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2011, 02:03:00 PM »
I almost get this one but at the end the deal called-off...

also, i dont' like it being call "replica" even it's not..it's just an reissue for the 1957 model.... and CK is right, might as well go for the real vintage then...

Offline TheHobbit

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3328
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2011, 02:07:23 PM »
Marketing. I guess not many knew that the Speedmaster came out before the popular 'moonwatch'.

The original was the CK2915-1 (cal 321) made in 1957 with the so called broad Arrow hands, borrowed from the Omega Seamaster.
The next model, CK2998-2 (cal 321) made in 1958/59 with dolphin hands and the MKII dial.
The next model, CK2998-6 (cal 321) made in 1958/59 with dolphin hands and black dial (moon watch dial) and luminous chrono seconds hand.
The next model, CK2998-4 (cal 321) made in 1958/59 with dolphin hands and black dial (moon watch dial) and non luminous chrono seconds hand.

The CK2915 and CK2998 are very rare and difficult to find.

The next model, ST105003 (cal 321) made in 1964. Looks like the moon watch we now know and love, with straight hands.

Personally I do like the Broad Arrow reference 3594.50, but I guess it is 'safer' to go with the 3570.

Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2011, 02:11:43 PM »
Personally I do like the Broad Arrow reference 3594.50, but I guess it is 'safer' to go with the 3570.
Why you say is 'safer'?

Offline TheHobbit

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3328
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2011, 02:15:58 PM »
Personally I do like the Broad Arrow reference 3594.50, but I guess it is 'safer' to go with the 3570.
Why you say is 'safer'?

Better price when you want to sell it. If I were to get a Speedmaster, I would get the Broad Arrow and not the 3750 as I do not (rarely) sell my watches. But if you do sell your watches (for what ever reason), the safer bet would be the 3750 as it is the 'more well known' Speedmaster.

Offline hanz079

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
  • I is Rocks!!
    • WATCHIONABLE
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2011, 05:09:22 PM »
Is this "reissue" or "replica" still in production?
Terrenceterrence "seriously, i think buying a watch for it's secondhand value is like getting married and thinking about divorce at the back of your mind."


watchionable.blogspot.com

Offline Gigi

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1176
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2011, 06:48:15 PM »
Personally I do like the Broad Arrow reference 3594.50, but I guess it is 'safer' to go with the 3570.
Why you say is 'safer'?

Better price when you want to sell it. If I were to get a Speedmaster, I would get the Broad Arrow and not the 3750 as I do not (rarely) sell my watches. But if you do sell your watches (for what ever reason), the safer bet would be the 3750 as it is the 'more well known' Speedmaster.

Agreed. But I hope ppl doesnt buy the watch for the sake of resale or watsoever.

Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #17 on: March 28, 2011, 06:51:43 PM »
Is this "reissue" or "replica" still in production?
no more.

Offline Friedrice

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • qui parle trop manque souvent
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #18 on: March 28, 2011, 08:39:13 PM »
Not a sifu but I would like to share.

For some reason, Omega called this model as Broad Arrow 1957 'Replica' instead of reissue  :HammerHead:

They came on a bracelet (3594.50.00) and on a strap (3894.xx.xx). For the cream Broad Arrow, it is the later prodcution which fitted caliber 3313 movement.

Why that is less demand on this model?
I don't know, maybe it is due to the over popularity of the moonwatch (3570) than this 'replica'.
The other issue the silver hands, it will would completely disappear in bright light and making it hard to tell the time.



And it is also partially because the broad arrow hands are way too big and it completely obstructs the view of the smaller indices (the minute and hour sub-dials for the chornograph function).
Rolex datejust 16200
Rolex Submariner Date 116610LN
Omega Aqua Terra Co-Axial 8500
Omega seamaster co-axial GMT 2535.80
Omega speedmaster sapphire sandwich 3573.50
Breitling Avenger II GMT
Longines Legend Diver Date
Zenith 2532
Omega seamaster bumper 355
Tissot T-Touch expert
Ball engineer master ii diver
Ball trainmaster pulsemeter
Tag heuer aqua racer automatic

Offline terrenceterrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
    • scrapsofmylife
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #19 on: March 29, 2011, 03:51:49 PM »
If you do like this piece, the preowned price is a good couple of hundred SGD cheaper than the "basic" moonwatch of the same age and condition.
Better outrun my gun....faster than my bullet


Offline chrisyen

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5959
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #20 on: March 29, 2011, 10:33:18 PM »
If you do like this piece, the preowned price is a good couple of hundred SGD cheaper than the "basic" moonwatch of the same age and condition.


really? pls pm me if u find any good condition with all box n papers

Offline terrenceterrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
    • scrapsofmylife
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2011, 08:33:03 AM »
found a few on my visit to Japan. Try googling up Komehyo

also found a few in timezon and WUS round for 1.5-1.8k USD.

quite a good deal i reckon.
Better outrun my gun....faster than my bullet


Offline terrenceterrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
    • scrapsofmylife
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2011, 08:37:03 AM »
honestly, the whole "moonwatch" thing is a marketing hype.

yes, we all know NASA issued moonwatches to their astronauts but personally the Astronauts all prefer and wears their own Rolex GMT to space.

Better outrun my gun....faster than my bullet


Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Why no love for the Broad Arrow 3594.50?
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2011, 09:14:35 AM »
honestly, the whole "moonwatch" thing is a marketing hype.

yes, we all know NASA issued moonwatches to their astronauts but personally the Astronauts all prefer and wears their own Rolex GMT to space.
Hype or not, but speedy did went through few torturous test by NASA without scratch.