3 divers, Rm 12k, 1decision . UPDATE : Decision made , with pictures !!

[TheHobbit]

I thought the 2 liner look more identical to the 5513. Thats all. I dont think they are that short-lived. I personally think the 4 liners are more short-lived.

The 2-liner 14060M was available for many many years, since the 1990's (I think) after the discontinuation of the 5513 gloss dial and had tritium dials in the 1990's. Personally, I prefer the 4-liner.

Next best thing to the 5512......

[rusminag]

If you are willing to wait, you may put Tudor Pelagos in the mix.

[terrenceterrence]

A 42mm 8500 PO is very.....very well made and worth every cent of it's asking price. If you do not mind preowned, it can be quite a bargain and within your budget. The finishing is top notch.

But being a 14060M owner, I might be just a tad bias to say that I would still chose the Sub over the PO. I just prefer how it looks and feel on my wrist. All is individual I would reckon. The PO sits a bit higher due to the sapphire case back. But I must admit the finishing of the movement, dial, case and etc..is beautiful for it's price range.

Since these 2 models are quite a norm in both preowned shops and ADs, I would recommend make a visit to try 'em on your wrist. Your heart would tell you the answer.

Don't worry about resale prices. I find it funny that guys fret so much about resale prices when they would definitely be way poorer if they get divorced. If that matters so much, then don't get married and buy selected Rolex sports model only.

[ivanpei]

With that kind of money, a brand new Omega is the best choice for divers. Either the 8500 PO or the 2500 SMP. SMPs are always a classic and are a great watch.

[Godzillaz]

and the RM would change to SGD for 12k budget 

Personally I would take a 5512 over the 14060M anytime of the day.

Regards
Tyler

I thought the 2 liner look more identical to the 5513. Thats all. I dont think they are that short-lived. I personally think the 4 liners are more short-lived.

The 2-liner 14060M was available for many many years, since the 1990's (I think) after the discontinuation of the 5513 gloss dial and had tritium dials in the 1990's. Personally, I prefer the 4-liner.

Next best thing to the 5512......

[MRH]

Hi all... my first post here

DrJ... You will at the end of the day be spending your money and be wearing the watch you choose come day or night so my take is that 1) you can live with its looks hopefully forever and 2) it feels comfortable when worn.

I would go with the Omega s I too am a Bond fan (I have 5 myself) but everyone will say I'm biased but for your budget, you will buy a future classic BRAND NEW.

Alternatively, you may want to consider Longines, Oris or Mido diver range or even B&M which tho use ETA, looks good and may be cheaper than your budget.

Happy hunting!

[Dr.j]

A 42mm 8500 PO is very.....very well made and worth every cent of it's asking price. If you do not mind preowned, it can be quite a bargain and within your budget. The finishing is top notch.

I agree with you that the 8500 is a better watch, but the 2500 has its strong merits too. Anyhow, i will take a close look at the 8500 this weekend.

Thanks for all the info , especially about the Rolex. You guys are definitely a passionate bunch.   

[Dr.j]

I would go with the Omega s I too am a Bond fan (I have 5 myself) but everyone will say I'm biased but for your budget, you will buy a future classic BRAND NEW.

Hey MRH, great to meet another bond fan. Excited about Skyfall ? Blue dial Aqua Terra   .... Yummy...

This trend needs some photos.

Come one MRH, Lets see those bond watches... 

[skygan]

rolex...rolex...rolex...!

[IWCking]

Rolie is definitely the best choice among the 3. But as some said earlier, 12k is probably not possible for a new one. if u can stretch your budget a bit more, go with rollie. its quite future proof. also, rollie is known for its reliability. people love it for a reason. If budget is fixed at 12k, then i will suggest PO. PO is more iconic than tudor.

[MRH]

http://s1245.photobucket.com/albums/gg593/mrasheedhassan/

There u go Dr J, my favourite 007 tool and arm candy, the limited edition Seamaster no. 7187/10007. Will try to post a clearer picture next time.....

[MRH]

Yet to master the art of posting pics here...... will try again next time.... maybe with all 5 in a row.

[myric]

If me, I would go for Omega PO.

[johnjoux]

Out of the 3 models , i would pick the omega .

Nice watch with new movement.Im always fascinated by see through back. Handled this omega PO before and no doubt its a good made with nice lines and made.

Second choice would be the 14060M due to the price which is about 2k more that set it back. If the price is the same.. i would pick the sub no date.

Im talking about BNIB pieces .

Cheers

[Gigi]

Bro,

still looking to see what you end up eventually? Cant go wrong with 14060 and PO 8500 

[Everdying]

i think whoever is buying really needs to go try on both the PO 2500 and 8500.
while the 8500 may be a better watch on paper, it is also thicker at almost 16mm.
in the end, comfort is what matters more right?

[Gigi]

i think whoever is buying really needs to go try on both the PO 2500 and 8500.
while the 8500 may be a better watch on paper, it is also thicker at almost 16mm.
in the end, comfort is what matters more right?

PO 8500 with rubber strap is much more comfy. Dont really like the bracelet on it.. Just bogging down the watch

[IWCking]

Look like there are a lot of Omega fans here. Why dont you guys start a new post and show case all your omega. 

[azzamov]

Omega for me 

[drainbamage]

Rolex!

[Dr.j]

Thanks to everyone for their opinion.
I have made my decision, and i can't be happier.
This is a fastastic watch .Enjoy the pictures

[/img]

[terrenceterrence]

no photos

[IWCking]

beautiful watch, wear it in good health.

[MCCL88]

congrate for your new watch 

[TheHobbit]

Congrats on the PO. Nice watch indeed. Wear it ith good health and wealth.