Author Topic: New Rolex Submariner (Read 65234 times)

TheHobbit · « **on:** March 07, 2012, 06:19:55 PM »

I am happy that Rolex has finally updated the Submariner, but wish it was 42 mm instead of 40 mm. Oh well, 5513?

sean · « **Reply #1 on:** March 07, 2012, 06:27:31 PM »

So that's means the new submariner is still 40mm?

takashi78 · « **Reply #2 on:** March 07, 2012, 06:43:43 PM »

But with a new case and ceramic bezel.

watchmanu · « **Reply #3 on:** March 07, 2012, 06:48:17 PM »

Old 40mm diameter with new bigger case just like GMT 2? Nice!

hanz079 · « **Reply #4 on:** March 07, 2012, 07:02:27 PM »

Since the old Sub is going for 19k now... these new ones are likely to be around 23-24k?
That's like GMTIIc territory.... blur...

sm · « **Reply #5 on:** March 07, 2012, 07:13:21 PM »

I really dont know how the RP goes. Those days when rolex price goes up, the AD tell me that
USD strengthens against RM. Today when USD is low, they tell me that swiss franc is v high against RM. I agree that the new yatchmaster n sub ceramic will be at least Rm25K RP.

ivanswk · « **Reply #6 on:** March 07, 2012, 07:28:00 PM »

winner

bwee · « **Reply #7 on:** March 07, 2012, 07:41:12 PM »

Hans.. I asked an AD 2 days ago the price of the old sub (on behalf of a friend), They quoted RM26k... How come such a big price difference?

ck77 · « **Reply #8 on:** March 07, 2012, 07:42:44 PM »

Finally

14060M has been disappear on their website years ago.

TheHobbit · « **Reply #9 on:** March 07, 2012, 07:44:28 PM »

Quote from: bwee on March 07, 2012, 07:41:12 PM

Hans.. I asked an AD 2 days ago the price of the old sub (on behalf of a friend), They quoted RM26k... How come such a big price difference?

Hahahahaha the nonsense has started. Now the prices of the 14060M (4 line version will sky rocket). Now where was that nice 14060M 2 line for sale ad.....

hanz079 · « **Reply #10 on:** March 07, 2012, 07:49:32 PM »

Quote from: bwee on March 07, 2012, 07:41:12 PM

Hans.. I asked an AD 2 days ago the price of the old sub (on behalf of a friend), They quoted RM26k... How come such a big price difference?

26k? That's like the price of the Sub C Date... Submariner 14060m should be around 19k+ no discount.

ck77 · « **Reply #11 on:** March 07, 2012, 08:03:14 PM »

There is a sub in sale section.
Faster grab it before it raise 1k tomorrow

dpkong · « **Reply #12 on:** March 07, 2012, 08:53:31 PM »

... i'm thinking and thinking about that FS...

if only i could get myself to actually like the Sub line. closest for me is a little leaning towards the YM

gloomis · « **Reply #13 on:** March 08, 2012, 04:34:52 AM »

looks like alot brand has been following big watch trend...

ck77 · « **Reply #14 on:** March 08, 2012, 04:37:53 AM »

Quote from: gloomis on March 08, 2012, 04:34:52 AM

looks like alot brand has been following big watch trend...

Why you say so?
It's still 40mm, albeit a bigger case.

dennis.T · « **Reply #15 on:** March 08, 2012, 05:48:39 AM »

If 14060 price Sky rocket thn might as well get a 5513? I dnt like the thick lug even though I own a subC..

ivanswk · « **Reply #16 on:** March 08, 2012, 06:24:56 AM »

this will be a classic and best rolex made, take my money $$$

ck77 · « **Reply #17 on:** March 08, 2012, 01:19:21 PM »

Bye bye lug holes

TheHobbit · « **Reply #18 on:** March 08, 2012, 04:58:52 PM »

Quote from: ck77 on March 08, 2012, 01:19:21 PM

Bye bye lug holes

Sadly I am a sucker for lug holes......

GlySinn · « **Reply #19 on:** March 08, 2012, 07:48:37 PM »

Subs are ...

... By the way i think lug holes are sexy

genec · « **Reply #20 on:** March 08, 2012, 08:00:27 PM »

Quote from: bwee on March 07, 2012, 07:41:12 PM

Hans.. I asked an AD 2 days ago the price of the old sub (on behalf of a friend), They quoted RM26k... How come such a big price difference?

Was at rolex gardens this afternoon, 14060M still under 20... I think 26 is the submariner date
It is time to take the plunge???

sshark · « **Reply #21 on:** March 08, 2012, 08:32:32 PM »

I bought my black Sub (M series) at about rm18k in 2008. After 4 years it has increased by rm8k albeit it was the older version. So if I want to buy a Sub now, I have to forked out at least RM20k. Glad I did what I did then.

SubFoo · « **Reply #22 on:** March 09, 2012, 06:25:19 PM »

Prefer the old sub but definitely love the new blue lumes on the new one.....

Spider boy · « **Reply #23 on:** March 11, 2012, 08:05:04 AM »

Quote from: dennis.T on March 08, 2012, 05:48:39 AM

If 14060 price Sky rocket thn might as well get a 5513? I dnt like the thick lug even though I own a subC..

x2

sadly that's how Rolex is advancing and hope they won't do anything supersozing to the Daytona. New exp 1. has lost it's charm , same goes to exp.2 . The bigger aren't necessary better . I m not being biased I m speaking just on my own opinions. I wn big watches too, offshore ,yatchmaster 2,iwc.. But Rolex were true beauty on the previous 16610 and all the explorers before there were lugged being sized or super sized ! And common admit it, we are no celebrities :p

Manburg · « **Reply #24 on:** March 15, 2012, 08:43:43 PM »

Glad Rolex didn't kill the Submariner (basing upon the rumours and uncertainty swirling around this past couple of years). Even with the new ceramic bezel, this is the closest, relatively, to the original design. I personally love this 114060, and am interested to see it in person. Some say it will only reach our shore in September, which I hope is not true. As to the price, I'm hoping it's gonna retail at RM16K, though some might call that daydreaming!

News:

Author Topic: New Rolex Submariner (Read 65234 times)