Author Topic: First watch on the moon  (Read 10409 times)

Offline fizal

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
First watch on the moon
« on: August 23, 2011, 01:25:05 PM »
Hi, do any of you know what was the first watch ever warned on the moon? :)

Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2011, 01:35:13 PM »
ask uncle google or use the search function here,
http://www.malaysiawatchforum.com/index.php/topic,1820.0.html

Offline Omnipotent

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2011, 01:38:10 PM »
ask uncle google or use the search function here,
http://www.malaysiawatchforum.com/index.php/topic,1820.0.html

not correct...he asked what is the 1st watch to receive a warning  ;D

Offline terrenceterrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
    • scrapsofmylife
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2011, 01:48:19 PM »
yellow card?  :Laughing_on_floor:
Better outrun my gun....faster than my bullet


Offline terrenceterrence

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2476
    • scrapsofmylife
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2011, 02:42:06 PM »
Haiya, you guys ah, that's typo error, not broken England lah ;)

worn and warned ...very big difference ler....
Better outrun my gun....faster than my bullet


Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2011, 03:23:18 PM »
 :Laughing_on_floor: :Laughing_on_floor:
You guys are hilarious.

Offline Watchnewby

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1289
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2011, 04:02:50 PM »
Not sure about first watch on the moon, but I believe it is the Omega as NASA issued Omega watches to all American astronauts.

I do know the first watch into space was worn by Yuri Gargarin wearing a Poljot Sturmanskie pilot watch. All the Russian Pilot was assigned a pilot watch during their service with the Air Force.

Offline shamtv2555

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2011, 04:12:48 PM »
not mistaken is omega right

Offline Peiseh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2011, 04:27:59 PM »
Qualification tests

Three years before the Speedmaster's official qualification, Wally Schirra took his personal CK 2998 aboard Mercury-Atlas 8 (Sigma 7) on October 3, 1962.[8] That same year, per an anecdote repeated by Omega press materials, trade publications, and NASA itself, a number of commercial chronograph wristwatches were furtively purchased from Corrigan's, a Houston jeweler, to evaluate their use for the Gemini and Apollo Programs.[8][9][6] James Ragan, a former NASA engineer responsible for Apollo flight hardware testing, has downplayed this story, calling it a "complete invention". Instead, bids were officially solicited of several brands already familiar to astronauts, including Breitling, Rolex, and Omega, as well as others that produced mechanical chronographs.[10][11] Hamilton submitted a pocket watch and was disqualified from consideration, leaving three contenders: Rolex, Longines-Wittnauer, and Omega. These watches were subjected to tests under extreme conditions:

High temperature: 48 hours at 71° C followed by 30 minutes at 93° C
Low temperature: Four hours at -18° C
Temperature cycling in near-vacuum: Fifteen cycles of heating to 71° C for 45 minutes, followed by cooling to -18° C for 45 minutes at 10-6 atm
Humidity: 250 hours at temperatures between 20° C and 71° C at relative humidity of 95%
Oxygen environment: 100% oxygen at 0.35 atm and 71° C for 48 hours
Shock: Six 11ms 40 G shocks from different directions
Linear acceleration: from 1 to 7.25G within 333 seconds
Low pressure: 90 minutes at 10^-6 atm at 71° C followed by 30 minutes at 93° C
High pressure: 1.6 atm for one hour
Vibration: three cycles of 30 minutes vibration varying from 5 to 2000hz with minimum 8.8G impulse
Acoustic noise: 30 minutes at 130db from 40 to 10,000hz [9][6]

All chronographs tested were mechanical hand-wind models since neither the first automatic chronograph nor the first quartz watch would be available until 1969. The evaluation concluded in March 1965 with the selection of the Speedmaster, which survived the tests while remaining largely within 5 seconds per day rate. [8][6][10][12]

source - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Speedmaster

here. buzz aldrin with the qualified Omega Speedmaster

Offline Peiseh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2011, 04:31:27 PM »
hm... interesting..

In 1971, Apollo 15 commander David Scott's issued Speedmaster lost its Plexiglas crystal during EVA-2. For EVA-3, the final lunar surface EVA, he wore a Waltham chronograph watch that he had agreed to evaluate for the company.[20][21] Because of the commercial interests involved and the revelation of the Apollo 15 postage stamp incident, NASA withheld Waltham's name for years afterward. Therefore, while the Speedmaster was the first watch worn on the moon, it is not the only one, as Omega often claims on its watches and in marketing materials.
In addition to issued crew watches, Apollo 17 carried an additional Speedmaster to lunar orbit as part of the Heat Flow and Convection Experiment conducted by Command Module pilot Ronald Evans.[22][23] This watch was sold for $23,000 at a Heritage Auction in 2009

Offline krusell

  • Freshie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2011, 05:50:22 PM »
Hi, do any of you know what was the first watch ever warned on the moon? :)

So curious.. which timezone was the watch tune to? ???
"Happy are they that can hear their detractions and put them to mending"

Offline TheHobbit

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3328
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2011, 05:57:50 PM »
Hi, do any of you know what was the first watch ever warned on the moon? :)

So curious.. which timezone was the watch tune to? ???

Some of them wear 2 watches or watches that can tell two or more time zones. One is normally set to GMT and another to Houston.

Offline siodee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
  • lalala..la..lalala....lala...lalalalala
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2011, 07:22:28 AM »
Newbie first post already got tarik kao kao, how is he dare to post any more question? Bro Fizal, kalau ada question tentang Omega watch, you boleh tanya more specific, Guru here boleh tolong. Kita semua Bro sini la. I akan sapport you.  :thumbsup:

“Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn’t do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore... Dream... Discover..." - Mark Twain

Offline Cloud7

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2011, 10:05:59 PM »
According to Capricorn One, man didn't actually set foot on the moon... yet... :P

Offline Sid Vicious

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 418
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2011, 11:51:49 PM »
I have a Sturmanskie  :thumbsup:

First watch on the moon for the Russians  ;D
"You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life."
Sir Winston Churchill

Offline Peiseh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2011, 06:29:48 AM »
..er...first watch to be in space and orbit the earth...

Offline Sid Vicious

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 418
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2011, 06:41:05 AM »
Maybe you are right there :thumbsup:

First in space then  ;D
"You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life."
Sir Winston Churchill

Offline siodee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
  • lalala..la..lalala....lala...lalalalala
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2011, 07:18:21 AM »
According to Capricorn One, man didn't actually set foot on the moon... yet... :P

I remembered reading somewhere about the conspiracy of Neil Amstrong actually set foot on the mood. If that is truth, then Speedmaster only tested in one of the Hollywood's studio or somewhere in Arizona  ;D
“Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn’t do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore... Dream... Discover..." - Mark Twain

Offline Peiseh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2011, 10:37:07 AM »
I think whether genuine or not that Neil actually landed on the moon or not, the Speedmaster did go into space...which after the moon landings, many more space expeditions as well since it is the only qualified space watch by NASA.

Offline siodee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
  • lalala..la..lalala....lala...lalalalala
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2011, 07:13:34 AM »
Armstrong must have read this thread, age 81 now, announce want to go back to Moon again, and urge the government to put in more fund for the space project. Is it again? or First time?? ;D
“Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn’t do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore... Dream... Discover..." - Mark Twain

Offline Peiseh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #20 on: August 26, 2011, 11:42:53 AM »
..divert a bit here....come to think of it...why isn't there another moon landings since NASA is able to operate the space shuttle so effectively??
With the current advance technology that they have, I would think they could easily send a vehicle to the moon, land on it, EVA, check out the moon surrounding, and blast back to earth..

hm...does provoke some curiosity indeed...

Offline Peiseh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #21 on: August 26, 2011, 11:47:31 AM »
..divert a bit here....come to think of it...why isn't there another moon landings since NASA is able to operate the space shuttle so effectively??
With the current advance technology that they have, I would think they could easily send a vehicle to the moon, land on it, EVA, check out the moon surrounding, and blast back to earth..

hm...does provoke some curiosity indeed...

Offline siodee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
  • lalala..la..lalala....lala...lalalalala
Re: First watch on the moon
« Reply #22 on: August 26, 2011, 12:32:53 PM »
..divert a bit here....come to think of it...why isn't there another moon landings since NASA is able to operate the space shuttle so effectively??
With the current advance technology that they have, I would think they could easily send a vehicle to the moon, land on it, EVA, check out the moon surrounding, and blast back to earth..

hm...does provoke some curiosity indeed...

Obviously you have not watched the Transformer 3, who dare to go to wake up the machine  :Laughing_on_floor: :Laughing_on_floor:

Well, the problem is, they can land but can not leave, as pointed out by China Space Shuttle program. Somebody has to build a base on the moon to allow the re-launch....

Just my 18 cents
“Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn’t do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore... Dream... Discover..." - Mark Twain