Author Topic: Does chrono really matters in a watch ? (Read 6482 times)

mkkong · « **on:** September 25, 2015, 11:11:02 PM »

Hi all,
I have been wondering for the longest time, does having a chrono function important in a watch ? Do we really use it ? Reason for saying this is that the chrono watches are so much expensive as compared to non-chrono. Example : AP Royal Oak Offshore Diver are much more cheaper than Offshore.

Is it worth paying extra (much more) for having the chrono function ?

antoniosaprozeld · « **Reply #1 on:** September 26, 2015, 08:59:15 AM »

Not a pro.. but i supposed the perceived value that come with the complications?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Lurch · « **Reply #2 on:** September 26, 2015, 09:56:46 AM »

No use to me personally. More for the asthetic
I told myself not to buy another chrono ever.

Everdying · « **Reply #3 on:** September 26, 2015, 10:11:49 AM »

yea, i believe most ppl buy a chrono as they want a busier looking dial.
as for me, the only real chrono i got is a speedy...just cos its a speedy

KimmJio · « **Reply #4 on:** September 26, 2015, 10:26:36 AM »

The chrono function is also hardly useful to me, unless i wanna time my runs or dive. But then again, under such circumstances i would rather use a digital watch or a proper dive watch. Or i could use the chrono to time my half boiled eggs.

On a more serious note, i personally would not look for a mechanical chrono watch. Firstly, due to under usage for me. Secondly, the selling price will also be higher. Thirdly, the service costs will definitely be much higher too. And if i want a more complicated looking watch, i'd go for small seconds/PR indicator/moon phase/calender functions.

engkow · « **Reply #5 on:** September 26, 2015, 01:28:36 PM »

Regret buying chrono, never used it but it is must have today trend, "you have I have" just like owning a Rolex but don't wear, very seldom
wear it...

D'Andy · « **Reply #6 on:** September 26, 2015, 04:15:32 PM »

My first Swiss watch was a chrono. Flipped it as I deemed it too busy after some time. Thereafter have been mainly staying with clean diver dials except for the Speedy. Usage of the chrono? Hardly, during my ownership of such watches.

Clicko · « **Reply #7 on:** September 26, 2015, 04:57:06 PM »

Chrono does not really matter to me. I think just keep 1 or 2 good ones. Will focus on 3 hands.

TJWN · « **Reply #8 on:** September 27, 2015, 04:12:10 AM »

I always use the chrono when I am brewing coffee...

toypoodle · « **Reply #9 on:** September 27, 2015, 06:43:45 AM »

Good to time baking cake

kingpin · « **Reply #10 on:** September 27, 2015, 02:57:43 PM »

Seriously for me the chrono is something to make the watch a bit more complicated. Is a Yes or No answer because depend on my mood when to wear a chrono watch

.

And I am can guarantee most of the watch owner not really using it at all.

Timeless · « **Reply #11 on:** September 28, 2015, 11:54:07 AM »

First quick glance looks cool but after awhile it getting too busy on the dial

spacewalker · « **Reply #12 on:** September 28, 2015, 02:58:51 PM »

For me, I often use chronograph when I'm driving to measure time, or just use the tachymeter to measure driving speed

. Sometime I choose the chronograph version watch because of their size. I like the watches with > 42mm diameter.

Everdying · « **Reply #13 on:** September 28, 2015, 04:12:10 PM »

i use stopwatch on my g-shocks to time intervals in gym.
and also to time maggi mee boiling

Xix · « **Reply #14 on:** September 29, 2015, 06:34:03 AM »

Only use the chrono for the looks initially. Never actually use it for practical purposes. While I think most chrono looks too Bz, the speedy chrono looks well laid out and symmetrical. Wish to have one some day :-P

Sent thru Tapatalk

alphaz · « **Reply #15 on:** September 29, 2015, 07:56:38 AM »

I use it while cooking, commuting, and taking a huge dump.

theseira · « **Reply #16 on:** September 29, 2015, 09:13:46 AM »

Chronos are cool man. It is worth having one in your collection.

Some say chromos separates the men from the boys!

cklim · « **Reply #17 on:** September 29, 2015, 07:26:34 PM »

I never used the chrono function, but still addicted to chronograph watches despite already owned 3 pcs.
Probably because of its size, its thickness and its sophisticated appearance that grab my attention.
I wish to get a GMT, but i guess i will still go for chrono again whenever my hands get itchy

KimmJio · « **Reply #18 on:** September 29, 2015, 08:52:54 PM »

Quote from: alphaz on September 29, 2015, 07:56:38 AM

I use it while cooking, commuting, and taking a huge dump.

LOL! I like your last point.

MDF · « **Reply #19 on:** September 29, 2015, 08:58:08 PM »

Chrono takes up real estate on the dial

If u prefer a more complicated dial, then chrono is nice

Perpetual calendar also takes up some space but that is another story...

Yoda · « **Reply #20 on:** October 06, 2015, 02:41:17 PM »

90 % of my watches are non chrono. That leave 10% because ppl got I got Kiasu symptom

MRH · « **Reply #21 on:** October 25, 2015, 04:19:46 PM »

In all honesty, majority will not use the chrono function.

Some like the busy look and some like the added complication. I have the speedy and a millie miglia because I love the way they look and feel on my hand. And you definitely need one for a collection.

joshua95 · « **Reply #22 on:** November 02, 2015, 05:05:37 AM »

it really depends on the owner and his everyday situation i guess. I own an iwc port chrono and i am a student the chrono is extremely useful to me whenever i want to take a short break or time my route to uni etc.

ikttan · « **Reply #23 on:** November 02, 2015, 05:35:50 AM »

Chrono too busy for me. Don't have any, all 3 hands (except for one quartz, 2 hands)

GMTmaster · « **Reply #24 on:** November 02, 2015, 03:34:05 PM »

Some chrono have screw down buttons, makes timing even more time consuming. $:-\$

News:

Author Topic: Does chrono really matters in a watch ? (Read 6482 times)