Author Topic: Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch  (Read 2510 times)

Offline kygan711

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch
« on: November 15, 2014, 06:17:18 AM »
Hi dear Sifu's

I am thinking of getting another watch which I have no problem with the selection.  At the moment i am keen on either of this models Pam190, Pam425 & pam424.

But rather I like to learn more about the reasoning to buy a 5 year old watch ( 190 ) vs new ( 425/424 ) in terms of maintenance and longevitiy of the watch or any other thoughts ? I dont place much weight on limited edition and out of production of the 190 as I am buying to wear and not a collector. So more on the other areas like praticality and such.

Glad you guys could help and expand my thinking horizon on this matter.



Offline JeepWH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1150
  • Tick...tick...tick....
Re: Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2014, 03:19:01 PM »
If you buy preowned, the price will be lower. However, there is the risk that the movement may be damaged but no one knows. Unless theres evidence that the watch has been overhauled.

New watch, pros are the manufacturer warranty, it obviously new.

In the end its your call.
Seiko fan.....

Offline Timeless

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2014, 05:14:53 PM »
if the preowned condition is mint, why not. Polish case and service movement doesn't cost u sky price anyway as per my experience

Offline Calibr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Re: Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2014, 07:00:51 AM »
Buy pre-owned only from a reliable source, otherwise the savings are not worth the headaches and troubles. New watches will age with you and develop their "characteristics" as you wear them.

Offline JeepWH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1150
  • Tick...tick...tick....
Re: Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2014, 07:38:25 AM »
if the preowned condition is mint, why not. Polish case and service movement doesn't cost u sky price anyway as per my experience

He is talking about Panerai. The service cost at the AD is like  :o
Seiko fan.....

Offline G.MAC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1895
Re: Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2014, 07:53:58 AM »
If i am in this situation, I still go for the PAM190. I loved it and still do. The 424 and 425 cant hold a candle to the 190. The 8 days JLC movement and the simplicity really does it for me. Having said that, a new watch is protected by its warranty. So unless the PAM190 really chokes your sanity, the 424/425 will be fine.
Your ONLY job in this world is to make sure that you are happy

Offline kygan711

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
Re: Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2014, 03:25:59 PM »
Thanks for the sharing.

Gmac- If the Pam190 is in good condition now working I mean than later breaks downs. This break down could happen to any watch correct ? All we could do is just inspect that no visual mark of the watch have been dropped or dented as precaution.

Cost for service for other watches and Paneria is big difference ?

Offline Timeless

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Buying a 5 year old watch vs New Watch
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2014, 08:16:53 PM »
if the preowned condition is mint, why not. Polish case and service movement doesn't cost u sky price anyway as per my experience

He is talking about Panerai. The service cost at the AD is like  :o

Try go Richemont directly instead of AD, I've few experiences and so far reasonable