Welcome to Malaysia Watch Forum, a place on the web for Malaysian Watch lovers to share their common interests. All are welcome to sign up. Registration is free.
Quote from: Enkidu on November 05, 2013, 06:12:33 PMQuote from: TheHobbit on November 05, 2013, 05:51:49 PMI think this is 'more' true if the company makes its own movement rather then buying it from a supplier. Like you, I am not 100% sure about this. The "snob factor" within me caused me to look up this COSC issue quite closely many years ago. One of the largest submitters of movements to COSC for certification was Breitling, and we all know at that time (about 10 years ago) Breitling was using all ETA / Valjoux movements. I guess we'll never know.I read some where that it is Rolex who is the largest submitters of movement to COSC for certification,correct me if I'm wrong.
Quote from: TheHobbit on November 05, 2013, 05:51:49 PMI think this is 'more' true if the company makes its own movement rather then buying it from a supplier. Like you, I am not 100% sure about this. The "snob factor" within me caused me to look up this COSC issue quite closely many years ago. One of the largest submitters of movements to COSC for certification was Breitling, and we all know at that time (about 10 years ago) Breitling was using all ETA / Valjoux movements. I guess we'll never know.
I think this is 'more' true if the company makes its own movement rather then buying it from a supplier.