Author Topic: luminox user come in please , not luminox user also come in  (Read 2078 times)

Offline masterzhen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
luminox user come in please , not luminox user also come in
« on: October 23, 2013, 06:35:20 PM »
hi guys im first time here im sorry if wrong topic or classify

im interested about this watch http://www.luminox.com/watches/sea/+/watch/A.3081.BO/

is it really navy seal's watch ? how about the band i google it some ppl say easy broken and the customer service also

where is it made from ? fully imported from swiss or what?

is it the price worth and why please ? if dont any others watches same function as this brand but cheaper than this can recommend please..

thank you for answering me  :) :)

Offline lek_e30

  • Freshie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: luminox user come in please , not luminox user also come in
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2013, 04:12:29 PM »
its been my daily wear already ever since i bought it..... the built quality is good. Worth!!

Offline hizal

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: luminox user come in please , not luminox user also come in
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2013, 04:22:26 PM »
i own the 3051 BO.
Good watch.

Some say the association with SEALs are just marketing hype.
Depending on what you look from the watch.
If value for money, I would say GShocks are better IMO.

thanks

Offline spacewalker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
Re: luminox user come in please , not luminox user also come in
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2013, 10:31:13 AM »
I own 3051 BO also.
Very nice watch, swiss movement. Superb lume.

But a few days ago I go to look some new luminox. Mine 3051 had stamped number "52" same as the warranty card. I found in that shop, same model without stamped any number 52 or 65. It is a identify number for that watch.

The salesman hardly explain to me the one that not stamped any number. I could notice the none stamped watches has a lose crown. Make me think twice to buy the new one. I'm planning to buy 3053

Anyone here experiencing this before?