Author Topic: ETA 6497 talk... maybe some justive for the pam  (Read 28919 times)

Offline ndtaan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: ETA 6497 talk... maybe some justive for the pam
« Reply #50 on: November 09, 2013, 08:58:54 AM »
I think this is 'more' true if the company makes its own movement rather then buying it from a supplier.

Like you, I am not 100% sure about this. The "snob factor" within me caused me to look up this COSC issue quite closely many years ago. One of the largest submitters of movements to COSC for certification was Breitling, and we all know at that time (about 10 years ago) Breitling was using all ETA / Valjoux movements. I guess we'll never know.

I read some where that it is Rolex who is the largest submitters of movement to COSC for certification,correct me if I'm wrong.

Offline harkensng

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: ETA 6497 talk... maybe some justive for the pam
« Reply #51 on: November 14, 2013, 08:36:30 AM »
Enkidu with a pam 512? Bro...are you sure? Sun will rise from the west.

Anyway write a full review once you got it. Compare with the 6497 also.

God bless :Cheers: