Author Topic: Would you pay a premium for a used/vintage watch but you can still get a brand new model at half the  (Read 4233 times)

Offline kukujiao

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
You may not get the exact same model but I have seen those used speedmaster pro or heuer monaco on the net going for double the price of a new one.

Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk


Offline Cocas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2923
You may not get the exact same model but I have seen those used speedmaster pro or heuer monaco on the net going for double the price of a new one.

Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk

I will only buy Ball EHC good condition pre-owned piece.

Offline elado249

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
I wouldn't pay

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk


Offline Everdying

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
the vintage speedmasters may have a different more desirable movement.
the monacos u see are heuers, not tags.
all collector driven markets.

Offline adamjohari

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
  • Wristy
I would definitely pay premium for a vintage Heuer. Those things are out of this world. Same with the vintage Rolex. The older Daytonas are awesome.
Adam J
Currently own: Rolex GMT Pepsi 126710BLRO mark 1

Offline kukujiao

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
Why because Zenith movement?

Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk


Offline Spider boy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
The older speedmaster uses column wheel chronos which are more superior than the never cam actuated ones therefore, being part of the reason to be more sought after, and yes i will pay . Most of the prices are derived from demand and supply. The lesser the supply, the more expensive it is. " Rare" , its a very sensitive term in watch industry ... lol.

Some collectors told me new rolexs has not much soul and anyone can buy it from the shop. Vintages are more rare and harder to find, so when coffee time with their friends , they can brag more and will be different from the rest of the pack.

Offline adamjohari

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
  • Wristy
Not because of the Zenith movement. The older ones just look nicer. The super old Daytona uses the Valjoux 72 workhorse. Rolex is getting beefier by the minute. The new submariners looks like the old submariner on steroids. Less elegant for me.
Adam J
Currently own: Rolex GMT Pepsi 126710BLRO mark 1

Offline D'Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1245
  • Success. It's a mind game.
Am considering. I was offered an SD1665 (1978) vide my blog, and may just flip my SD116600 (2016) to raise some cash towards it. SD116600 retails at RM38k, and the collector flipping the SD1665 was asking for RM38k non-negotiable. Apparently, his SD is in relatively good condition and he was willing to deal over at RSC. Would you flip a current SD to get a vintage SD?
Watch hobbyist @ andywristwatches.blogspot.com. Current faves in my collection :

Rolex | Omega | Bell & Ross | Panerai | Seiko | G-Shock |

Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2781
Am considering. I was offered an SD1665 (1978) vide my blog, and may just flip my SD116600 (2016) to raise some cash towards it. SD116600 retails at RM38k, and the collector flipping the SD1665 was asking for RM38k non-negotiable. Apparently, his SD is in relatively good condition and he was willing to deal over at RSC. Would you flip a current SD to get a vintage SD?
A good and orignal condition 1665 is hard to come by, why not?
You can get back 116600 anytime.

Offline Cocas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2923
Am considering. I was offered an SD1665 (1978) vide my blog, and may just flip my SD116600 (2016) to raise some cash towards it. SD116600 retails at RM38k, and the collector flipping the SD1665 was asking for RM38k non-negotiable. Apparently, his SD is in relatively good condition and he was willing to deal over at RSC. Would you flip a current SD to get a vintage SD?

I will keep existing SD for sure if I were you.

Offline D'Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1245
  • Success. It's a mind game.
A good and orignal condition 1665 is hard to come by, why not?
You can get back 116600 anytime.

Your words literally echoed what I had in mind!  :Cheers:
Still debating if I should let go of my SD116600, as it literally has no dings/dents/scratches and is as-new. The 1665 should have some battle scars, but that was to be expected since it was 38 years old.
Watch hobbyist @ andywristwatches.blogspot.com. Current faves in my collection :

Rolex | Omega | Bell & Ross | Panerai | Seiko | G-Shock |

Offline wildaxlrose

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
I would prefer the newer versions 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Spider boy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
i own a sd4000 and to be honest , i will trade a good 1665 with no second thoughts at all . i think comparing a new sd4000 to the rare 1665 is slightly unfair,  lol... cause its a different league.  1665 is rare... but anyone can buy a sd4000.  Just like a new porsche carrera vs 993 or any older than that

Offline ck77

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2781
Guys, if you are into vintage, especially Rolex vintages, you will know what's the big deal of 1665.

However, I'll prefer a 16660 for daily use


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline kukujiao

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
I just saw a 1967 Speedmaster going for USD8k, approximately RM32k+

Sent from my SM-N9208 using Tapatalk