Malaysia Watch Forum
Main Forums => General Discussion - Modern Watches => Topic started by: Yoda on December 18, 2012, 11:16:39 AM
-
My verdict:-
Sumo:-
Elegant tough looking diver
M-Force:-
Rough, macho and tough looking
Any comment from MWF members?
(http://i1285.photobucket.com/albums/a585/leong33/Collection/SAM_2391_zps53c08413.jpg)
-
The M-Force does have a more tool-like look to it as compared to the Sumo. But between the two, I like the Sumo more. I prefer the bezel of the Sumo more than the M-Force.
-
totally agree.
The M-Force looks flashy, gimmicky and flamboyant.. I guess it would appeal to younger buyers..
The Sumo is more practical, purposeful and functional where design follows function….(bauhaus-like but not as pure as the teutonic designs)..this would appeal to older buyers….
-
I have both pieces and in terms of comfort i find the bracelet on the sumo more comfortable .
For practical purposes, the power reserve is useful to me and orient wins on that front.
In terms of style, depending on your individual taste, both have their fans...
-
(http://i1285.photobucket.com/albums/a585/leong33/008_zps5f982901.jpg)
I have change the strap to a water resistant rubber and looks better to me, instead of the original bulky ss. This has an advantage in terms of antimagnetic and shock resistant to that Sumo
Diameter: 46mm
Thickness: 13.30mm
Lug width: 23mm
Certificated by ISO 6425 diver’ s watches, ISO 764 antimagnetic watches
and ISO 1413 shock-resistant
-
Orient M-force is too generic. My vote goes to Sumo.
-
Sumo...
-
i have a Sumo and loved the Sumo.
i always feel that Sumo is nice with the original bracelet.
I have tried on Nato and it look strange.
-
It's a bit narrow on the natostrap.