Some personal observations:
In the Luxury category Patek Philippe has replaced Omega in the 3rd position. Looks like MWF members have grown more discerning in their taste for luxury watches.
In the Affordable category Seiko has expanded its lead by a substantial margin. Value proposition still remains an important criteria in this category.
:Cheers:
zenith shocked me....Only 1 vote leh from me... ;D ;D
strong support from east msia? :Laughing_on_floor: :Laughing_on_floor: :Laughing_on_floor:
Patek in 3rd whilst Rollie and Panerai 1st/2nd ?Of course different forums will have different conclusions.
I beg to differ with your conclusion..
Whilst different ppl have diff parameters in evaluating a watch, exposure does play a part.
In other forums I'm sure the survey would be very differentSome personal observations:
In the Luxury category Patek Philippe has replaced Omega in the 3rd position. Looks like MWF members have grown more discerning in their taste for luxury watches.
In the Affordable category Seiko has expanded its lead by a substantial margin. Value proposition still remains an important criteria in this category.
:Cheers:
Patek in 3rd whilst Rollie and Panerai 1st/2nd ?
I beg to differ with your conclusion..
Whilst different ppl have diff parameters in evaluating a watch, exposure does play a part.
In other forums I'm sure the survey would be very different
Patek in 3rd whilst Rollie and Panerai 1st/2nd ?
I beg to differ with your conclusion..
Whilst different ppl have diff parameters in evaluating a watch, exposure does play a part.
In other forums I'm sure the survey would be very different
When you say "your" conclusion, what do you mean?
This result is a summary of a vote by all the members here. Not just the mod or owner of the forum.
I hope I did not offend anyone, not my intention.
zenith shocked me....Only 1 vote leh from me... ;D ;D
strong support from east msia? :Laughing_on_floor: :Laughing_on_floor: :Laughing_on_floor:
GO was my vote... but I still find Omega gives most for the money it's kind of a prestigous Seiko (Grand Seiko sadly most ppl wont get what a great watch it is) but im biased to both Omega and Seiko and just dreaming of GO panomatic (but i will get it) Kinda like I played in my local team (UFC) but dreamt of Barcelona (maybe they will have a goodwill game or charity game where dumbasses like me can pay 2 play hehe)
GO was my vote... but I still find Omega gives most for the money
GO was my vote... but I still find Omega gives most for the money
I too voted for GO. Personally, I feel the GO is at least a notch above Omega, but that's just my personal prejudice against Omega. ;D
GO was my vote... but I still find Omega gives most for the money
I too voted for GO. Personally, I feel the GO is at least a notch above Omega, but that's just my personal prejudice against Omega. ;D
For luxury watch category, still no one can challenge the "King". Maybe the reason is MWF members in Malaysia perceive that the "King" is their favourite brand of luxury watch.i think maybe the definition was not really clear as it was "brand survey - luxury category". if i were to vote i will surely vote for my dream watch which i may not be able to afford ;)
I think Seiko should give rebates to ppl on forums... don't think as many people would know how great they are and understand that maybe some snotty nosed b*stard might think low of it going around with his breitling (have nothing against Breitling) the ppl who knows a lill bit will like em... my seiko 5 kinda sucks but thats because i went to get it rucked, my king seiko never faults me and its older than me. Same goes for my Omega seamaster from the 60's, works perfectly!
Longines was not considered?
Suprising Seikooooooo.......
Still cant forgive myself for missing on a purchase on a Credor ultra thin skeleton.....
There is Seiko and there is SEIKO….they are a 1st class vertically integrated manufacture with a 130 year history
You cannot of course compare a RM 200 Seiko to a RM 2,000 Swiss/German but for the same amount of money say RM 10,000, you'll be surprised at the quality that Seiko can produce…
Seiko has a wide range such as Seiko 5, Prospex, Brightz and Ananta even without mentioning the higher end Grand Seiko, Galante, Credor range…Seikos (which include Ananta) are priced from RM 200 to RM 20,000...
Credors on the other hand goes up to > USD 100,000Suprising Seikooooooo.......
There is Seiko and there is SEIKO….they are a 1st class vertically integrated manufacture with a 130 year history
You cannot of course compare a RM 200 Seiko to a RM 2,000 Swiss/German but for the same amount of money say RM 10,000, you'll be surprised at the quality that Seiko can produce…
Seiko has a wide range such as Seiko 5, Prospex, Brightz and Ananta even without mentioning the higher end Grand Seiko, Galante, Credor range…Seikos (which include Ananta) are priced from RM 200 to RM 20,000...
Credors on the other hand goes up to > USD 100,000Suprising Seikooooooo.......
Yes, SEIKO Rocks !!
I believe it can rival the Swiss watch manufacturer too!