Malaysia Watch Forum

Main Forums => General Discussion - Modern Watches => Topic started by: yuzhan on September 27, 2014, 02:44:19 PM

Title: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: yuzhan on September 27, 2014, 02:44:19 PM
hi guy, may I know what is the different between ETA7750 and SW260??
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: mike on September 27, 2014, 02:49:16 PM
ETA 7750 is a chronograph movement from ETA.
SW260 is a self winding small second movement from Sellita.
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: yuzhan on September 27, 2014, 08:03:26 PM
Quote from: mikster on September 27, 2014, 02:49:16 PM
ETA 7750 is a chronograph movement from ETA.
SW260 is a self winding small second movement from Sellita.
sellita is nt under ETA???
ETA is better???
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: yuzhan on September 28, 2014, 08:21:26 AM
ETA and Sellita which one better ???
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: jason_recliner on September 30, 2014, 11:19:39 AM
No difference - Selitta makes ETA clones. 
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: Timeless on October 06, 2014, 06:33:47 AM
ETA is reliable..
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: Cocas on June 26, 2016, 12:29:03 AM
ETA is so much better than Selita!
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: AbbasHabshee on June 26, 2016, 12:57:53 AM
You want a precise time keeping movement? Quartz is the best answer  :Laughing_on_floor:
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: D'Andy on June 26, 2016, 07:29:53 AM
Both are dependable workhorses. In terms of pricing of movement, ETA was more expensive. Having said that, I have had watches from brands like Oris that uses Selitta, with no problems whatoever. There are 3 grades of ETA movement eg Tudor and Omega used to use the top-grade (prior to using in-house movements), Tag Heuer and Ball used the medium-grade, and micro-brands use the basic, unmodified entry-grade (some like Steinhart provides value-for-monies by giving the medium-grade ETA). Both ETA and Selitta are good movements, in fact I dare say that Miyota is just as good, other than the snob factor.
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: dennis.T on June 26, 2016, 11:21:04 AM
If you comparing ETA 2892 with SW260 then is almost Apple to Apple.
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: JeepWH on June 27, 2016, 07:38:15 AM
Both are equally good.

IMHO, Seillita is better in terms of parts availability. ETA is limiting parts availability to its customers only now, therefore independent watchmakers cannot get ETA parts anymore soon.
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: elado249 on June 27, 2016, 08:03:12 PM
In coming years, swatch group will not sell eta to other brands anymore. They going towards inhouse thingy

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: tonykpk on June 27, 2016, 08:40:59 PM
I won't be surprise if  some group buy over selita
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: JeepWH on June 28, 2016, 08:59:56 AM
Quote from: tonykpk on June 27, 2016, 08:40:59 PM
I won't be surprise if  some group buy over selita

Definitely won't be a surprise......
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: Cocas on July 02, 2016, 08:09:47 AM
The SW coarse or less refine finishing on movement, in fact put me off a lots.
Title: Re: ETA7750 and SW260
Post by: JeepWH on July 02, 2016, 08:12:49 PM
Quote from: Cocas on July 02, 2016, 08:09:47 AM
The SW coarse or less refine finishing on movement, in fact put me off a lots.

On factory issue yes, but there are certain manufacturers which finishes the movements before assembling into their watches.