Malaysia Watch Forum
Main Forums => General Discussion - Modern Watches => Topic started by: sshark on January 17, 2014, 08:20:47 AM
-
... in the catalog
http://gizmodo.com/its-amazing-how-much-retouching-goes-into-even-a-wrist-1502851311?utm_campaign=socialflow_gizmodo_facebook&utm_source=gizmodo_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow (http://gizmodo.com/its-amazing-how-much-retouching-goes-into-even-a-wrist-1502851311?utm_campaign=socialflow_gizmodo_facebook&utm_source=gizmodo_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow)
-
Nice video I guess it is necessary because viewing these pieces in pictures is totally different from viewing the real thing. For me it looks better in the real life.
-
no wonder la .... pic on webpage always nicer thn real watch
-
normal lah, still better than the touch up made on the korean star...
-
The joke is,
i always skip Rolex news and articles because i knew that i cant afford one, but then i saw the share on the above at WUS and i click to check it out since i am very deep into photography hobby and the article is about photoshop.
Then voila, i saw the watch and wow, i love it instantly and thought, why not, maybe i can take it as a long term goal and get it.
So i do the search on the daytona cosmography in the article. OMG it cost 70k USD :mooning:. What a long tern goal.
-
same goes to modeling mag ;D
-
no harm setting a high goal. u will get there and you will be satisfied and happy when you do :)
-
I previously assumed they used rendereings, the watches look so perfect. Renderings would probably be easier.
-
Rolex being old school minded company they preferred to take photo and it and photshop from there instead of render out of thin air outright
-
Kudos Rolex.. good to know that the watch I buy will never look as good as the one in the photo.