Malaysia Watch Forum

Main Forums => Watch Reviews => Topic started by: sshark on August 29, 2010, 06:26:41 PM

Title: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: sshark on August 29, 2010, 06:26:41 PM
On Saturday I was supposed to shop for shirts. However, in the earlier part of the day, I went out with my Dennis to check out the watch shops. And by the end of the day, I bought no shirts but Seiko SBFG001.

(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4078/4936435085_cc368f6a63_z_d.jpg)

Seiko SBFG001 has the 80s retro look (which captured my heart) but has the features of present day i.e. world time and radio signal atomic time synchronization. This is indeed what I have been waiting for. I am almost pulled the trigger on Casio GW-S5600-1JF.

It wears comfortably but this photo gave the impression that it is almost as big as my hand. Believe me it is not. I trust it is the lightning effect and not my photography skill that caused this :)

(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4135/4934489497_3480e6fcca_z_d.jpg)

For those who are familiar with digital watches will almost instantly know what this watch is capable of by reading the specs.
   
The pushers are fantastic. The pushers went in firmly and effortless and that gave you an affirmative feedback. I can’t find this feeling with the Casio watches. Pressing the Casio buttons was like pressing a stuck button.

Also, the bracelet is not made of solid links. Each link is folded and "glued" to make it looks like solid link. If you examine carefully, u can see a line on the side of the link.

Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: duniajam on August 29, 2010, 07:08:18 PM
Congrats bro! Nice watch  :thumbsup:

Thanks for sharing... :Cheers:
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: gapper on August 29, 2010, 08:36:20 PM
great catch!  ;D

btw sshark, synchronizing the atomic timer isn't impossible here in Malaysia. believe it or not, i managed to sync. my MTG few weeks back (17/8).
but mine is multiband 6 (capable to sync atomic signals fr. Europe, North America, Japan and China), it's hard to get it sync'ed here... but not impossible. in fact, it's hard to get it sync over taiwan too, i guess it's pretty much location dependent. if you live somewhere higher, u might get to sync. but again, weather, interruption of others frequencies might blocking it. try to face ur watch somewhere near the window facing north, and setup auto synch over the nite and see.

(http://i709.photobucket.com/albums/ww96/xdma/RIMG0193.jpg)

anyway... welcome another atomic watch owner... hehe...
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: sshark on August 29, 2010, 08:47:42 PM
I could try but there r 2 immediate obstacles.

1. My watch doesn't recognize China radio controlled atomic clock sync. I doubt we are able to receive Japan's signal :)
2. I am a lot further to the south than KL hence further away from China. I presume u r in KL.
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: gapper on August 29, 2010, 09:06:30 PM
sshark,
not sure about seiko atomic radio synchronization method mate... does your seiko indicates the atomic signal strength? mine has the signal level indicator when activating the synchronization mode, it tells level3 sometime.. n sometime level1.

and yes, i'm at selangor to be precise.
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: chrisyen on August 29, 2010, 09:12:08 PM
i dun think malaysia can get the signal...
according to citizen watchmaker... even sabah hard to get
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: sshark on August 29, 2010, 09:34:04 PM
Yes it does have the signal indicator. So far it is offline. Will check out it later. Will update if any new discovery.

Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: gapper on August 29, 2010, 09:58:59 PM
chris,
i never expect it's sync-able too... as i gotten my m5600 few years back (multiband 5), it does shows the signal level1-2 but never get it sync'ed b4...

perhaps.. maybe it's hungry ghost festive that made my watch sync-able this month??!!  :shocked1:
and the frequencies level indicator shown collision of signal between the spirits of gshock then... kekeke... j/k

watever.. i just shared what i've experienced. :) pics attached shown the successful GET record... i will upload the photo of the signal leveling indicator when i'm free... hope some sifus may shed some lights on why the signal level indicating there's signals.
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: Scott C. on August 30, 2010, 08:27:11 AM
Congrats ;)

Do show show next time ya  :Cheers:
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: sshark on September 13, 2010, 06:10:12 PM
My experience with this watch time sync. I have tested it with Germany and UK signals. It worked well (for manual synch) in both instances. It will take @ least 5mins to synch. The manual says it will take about few mins to as long as 19mins to complete the process. The downside of it is its reception is very weak. You need to be in the right direction and place to synch successfully and you shouldn't move (according to the manual). So best if it can synch @ night but the watch has to be in the right section of the house not just near the window.

Also, I would like to hear those who had experienced with Casio radio time synch.
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: ZhaoYun on November 02, 2010, 11:14:32 AM
The size is really BIG ! But I like the technology to sync with Atomic clock ! :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: sshark on November 02, 2010, 11:50:07 AM
It is not really tat big. Some how in photo it looked big. Like they say, u look fatter in the photos :)
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: danny on November 02, 2010, 09:27:30 PM
...... Like they say, u look fatter in the photos :)

 :Laughing_on_floor: That's a good one.

The pictures were very likely taken with a wide angle lens.

 :Cheers:


Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: sshark on November 02, 2010, 09:49:25 PM
Guess so... it was taken with my iphone.
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: takashi78 on November 06, 2010, 07:15:46 PM
Can you move around when sync?
Or you need to just stand there?
Title: Re: Seiko SBFG001 Review
Post by: sshark on November 06, 2010, 07:32:05 PM
According to the manual u hv to be still