Malaysia Watch Forum

Main Forums => General Discussion - Modern Watches => Topic started by: mikeylacroix on March 28, 2016, 03:05:53 PM

Title: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: mikeylacroix on March 28, 2016, 03:05:53 PM: All these 5513s...16800s going around...
I just want a clean 2 liner with modern bits and pieces.
Of course one shows up.
Some fun pics...the 114060 was my first, don't think the 14060m will be my last

beautifully clean and simple
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/sub14060m0008_zpsmsactpnb.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/sub14060m0008_zpsmsactpnb.jpg.html)

(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/20160323_155151_resize_zpsvhmo12mw.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/20160323_155151_resize_zpsvhmo12mw.jpg.html)

totally a strap watch
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/20160323_215040_resize_zpsxduofdte.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/20160323_215040_resize_zpsxduofdte.jpg.html)

(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/2016-03-26%2000.03.31_resize_zpsob08vz0t.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/2016-03-26%2000.03.31_resize_zpsob08vz0t.jpg.html)

these 2 are seperated 10 years apart
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/2016-03-27%2012.24.31_resize_zpsi8irlhyt.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/2016-03-27%2012.24.31_resize_zpsi8irlhyt.jpg.html)

(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/2016-03-27%2012.25.26_resize_zpslckwdlnw.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/2016-03-27%2012.25.26_resize_zpslckwdlnw.jpg.html)

case comparison
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0008_zpsv6at8jpl.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0008_zpsv6at8jpl.jpg.html)
drilled lugs a super must

we all know the differences..just good to see them side by side here
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0003_zpsnyck6vzv.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0003_zpsnyck6vzv.jpg.html)

(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0001_zpswmnqzrjm.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0001_zpswmnqzrjm.jpg.html)

i really like the 'cut outs' on the ceramic bezel
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0009_zpsbf5akyxe.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0009_zpsbf5akyxe.jpg.html)

most don't like the maxi lugs..but obviously goes well with the maxi dial and hands.
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0010_zpsa6ntysel.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0010_zpsa6ntysel.jpg.html)

the 14060 is not as subtle as most would think...nobody does gloss and matte black like Rolex does IMHO.
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0011_zpsx77slmip.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0011_zpsx77slmip.jpg.html)

lume comparo
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0014_zps48ne5awn.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0014_zps48ne5awn.jpg.html)

(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/IMG-20160323-WA0022_zpstx3gtkwf.jpeg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/IMG-20160323-WA0022_zpstx3gtkwf.jpeg.html)

blue wins it for me
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/Rolex%20Submariner%20114060/subblue0004_zpsuycqtf4e.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/Rolex%20Submariner%20114060/subblue0004_zpsuycqtf4e.jpg.html)

on the wrist
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/sub14060m0001_zpsrr2pl9yt.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/Rolex%20Submariner%2014060m/sub14060m0001_zpsrr2pl9yt.jpg.html)

(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/Rolex%20Submariner%20114060/114060Submarine197_resize_zpsa731e739.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/Rolex%20Submariner%20114060/114060Submarine197_resize_zpsa731e739.jpg.html)

After this, i really feel the 16600 is the best in betweener. Would be fun to get my hands on a sd4k and get some wrist time.
the 14060m is funtastic here for the vintage look with modern tech. The newer model has more bits and bobs on it but works well together.
Which would I chose?
(http://i1375.photobucket.com/albums/ag448/qrchandc26/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0005_zps9imuhvkr.jpg) (http://s1375.photobucket.com/user/qrchandc26/media/14060m%20vs%20114060/subvssub0005_zps9imuhvkr.jpg.html)
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: Timeless on March 28, 2016, 06:07:26 PM: 14060 gets my vote
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: vinorus on March 28, 2016, 08:33:13 PM: Nice pictures. That means you know how to cherish beauty of both. I personally hate the previous version of bracelet Rolex made. Just my 2 cents.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: mikeylacroix on March 28, 2016, 09:01:47 PM: Quote from: vinorus on March 28, 2016, 08:33:13 PM
Nice pictures. That means you know how to cherish beauty of both. I personally hate the previous version of bracelet Rolex made. Just my 2 cents.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

ya this one has the folded end links and the older style divers clasp :Mad:
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: ywl23n on March 28, 2016, 11:07:29 PM: Very nice. I like the no-date sub because it is just so versatile. Bracelet, nato, vintage leather, all go well with the no-date sub.
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: Fearsome Puppy on April 16, 2016, 07:03:12 PM: 14060m on nato rocks. Miss mine...
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: psychokandy on April 23, 2016, 09:15:21 PM: I owned a 114060 and would really love to have a 14060 or 14060M if can find one in pre-owned. The design of the 14060 has slimmer lug and a timeless style with pin hole which is more of a tool watch.
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: DeepBlueSea on April 24, 2016, 09:14:06 PM: My vote on 114060 , looks bigger on wrist and really solid bracelet
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: WatchW on April 25, 2016, 05:27:16 AM: I'll take both! Hahahah

Great review and poisonous photos.
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: Spider boy on April 25, 2016, 07:18:47 AM: the older cases are the only ones that look good on straps . The new casing looks weird to be on strap, be it leather , nato or rubber. 14060 for collection and 114060 for daily beater =)
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: DeepBlueSea on April 25, 2016, 12:41:24 PM: Quote from: Spider boy on April 25, 2016, 07:18:47 AM
the older cases are the only ones that look good on straps . The new casing looks weird to be on strap, be it leather , nato or rubber. 14060 for collection and 114060 for daily beater =)

Sounds like a good plan ;D
Title: Re: 14060m vs 114060
Post by: adamjohari on April 25, 2016, 03:19:32 PM: Prefer the feel of the newer 904L steel. Only wish the 114060 didn't have so much writing...