Malaysia Watch Forum
Off Topic => Other Discussion (OT Discussion) => Topic started by: chrisyen on November 09, 2010, 05:50:30 AM
-
Yesterday tested the nx100
it good looking, much better than nex
but the low shooting is far behind the nex
I do not know, this one use different mounting lens again
what is Sony planning?
How many type of lens there need to develop?
-
Check this out:-
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/samsungnx100/
I think 2 things that made Nex take better low lighting photo then N100..
1) Nex using APS-C sensor (1.5x crop) compare to 4/3 on NX100.
2) Maybe the kit lens you tested on NX100 has smaller aperture (20mm-50mm/f3.5-5.6) compare to Nex's 16mm/f2.8.
-
thnx scott....
but the panasonic gf1 deliver much better focus and shooting speed with 4 / 3
-
thnx scott....
but the panasonic gf1 deliver much better focus and shooting speed with 4 / 3
Have not try the Panasonic GF-1 before... i guess it's all depend on the lens? I tested my friend's newly bought Olympus PL-1 (with kit lens) and don't really like it... but i heard this Olympus PL-1 is a very good camera but i can't feel the same maybe because of the kit lens? Just my guess...
-
I search all over and the nx100 seems to be a Samsung and not a Sony?
Or am i missing something here?
-
yeah samsung is nx100.
only aware of sony nex-5
anyway, just curious.
-
GF1 quality is DSLR like
NEX-5 is 90% DSLR quality
from my own observation la... NEX-5 damn stylo ....Sony mah
-
NEX-5 is 90% DSLR quality
why Nex-5 is 90% DSLR? ;D
-
guys... i just bought a gf1 after considering the available lens, focus speed.... at a bargain price from a guy who bought it for 2 days....
now with the superb quality pancake!!!
-
NEX-5 is 90% DSLR quality
why Nex-5 is 90% DSLR? ;D
maybe depends on the shooter la, when i point and shoot - auto mode, GF-1 picture is nicer...
NEX-5 also very very nice. for me, I will take NEX-5 due to it's smaller size and more economical.