Dear Sir and Mdm's,
Encik Yong of the rare gold Epos Ref 5015, Edox Minute Repeater, GP Francios Pirregaux made for Yokohama, Japan and worth his salt as a horologer genvois not forgetting the FP Journe, Vianney Halter Antiqua.
Had a heated argument with me shortly about comments on ones preferences and choice in buying.
It happened that Encik Yong was very upset that during a gtg with some high horology members to which I was witness had casually without malice stated that;
" Why did you go all the way to
[AD name removed- Mod] to buy the watch, that's a blunder !" (Encik Yong carried a huge amount of cash downtown)
Encik Yong took it to be rediculing him for buying the watch. And thereafter retreated from the high horology movement.
As such, I would humbly put to the floor of this august forum whether;
1.On casual speaking Encik Yong was too sensitive as the "blunder" could mean danger in taking so much cash with him in the tune of tens of thousands to buy the watch.
2.Even it meant the watch, Encik Yong could have dismissed it as an uninformed comment and lived with it and continue to enjoy high horology.
3.In short was Encik Yong too sensitive? Or the others too insensitive?
Speaking for myself I too made "blunder's" when buying various watches since I was told the likes;
"Why u wearing my kid's plastic watch" (my precious endured with me through tough environment gshock's)
"Why you bought a oldman watch" (my gmt master)
"No name, noone wants" (debaufre )
So thinking of those I too would have terasa but I persevered. Thank you for your thoughts.
Q