Author Topic: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic  (Read 4464 times)

Offline kopykopy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« on: November 04, 2015, 08:04:40 PM »
Hi there,

In the many threads in MWF as well as other watch forums, there are never ending supporters of Rolex Submariner Pre-Ceramic vs the SubC for many various reasons which I won't repeat here.  One interesting reason which I have read being posted is the age of the person ie. the older person likes the Pre-Ceramic while the younger person likes the new Sub C.  It will be interesting to actually find out from the forumers here.  I'll start.

Age: 45
Watch I own: Submariner 14060M 2 Liner

Offline Spider boy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2015, 09:06:49 PM »
3 pre ceramic submariners .  2 pre ceramic gmt
1 c seadweller 4000.   

Age 35.

For me , it's the lug that i dislike , not so much of the bezel . But i do prefer the colour of the metal bezel.

Offline mikeylacroix

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • DMChiropractic
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2015, 03:33:15 PM »
114060. 16600. 16613.
i like both kinds of bezels and both kinds of case profiles.

bracelet wise..new one wins hands down all day every day

Offline Karkas

  • Freshie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2015, 04:59:02 PM »
Own both 114060 and 14060. Love them both :Dancing_banana: :Dancing_banana:
Growing old is compulsory. Growing up is optional!
PP Calatrava 3919R
Rolex Submariner 14060m
Rolex Daytona 116520

Offline diazepam

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2015, 06:58:58 PM »
I dislike all the ceramic Rolexes.

The bezel is too big/wide. The numbering are too fat/wide and thus again, too big.

Again, maybe its my age - 41.

Offline Timeless

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2015, 08:34:09 PM »
116600, looks clear without cyclops

Offline Calibr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2015, 08:55:28 PM »
Sub C LV. The glidelock bracelet is worth whatever oddities one can find on the watch. :Cheers:

Offline beaujarle

  • Freshie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2015, 12:19:08 AM »
41...116610, 116613 & 116333.
Love the size of new generation Rollies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
PAM 111
Oris TT3 Time/Date
Omega Seamaster 2254.50

Offline theseira

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 536
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2015, 01:19:12 PM »
30

I own a Sub C Date. I like the pre ceramic versions as well, gone with the ceramic only because it was a good deal at the time.

Sub C is a good watch for what it is. IMO perfect for daily wear and it always looks new. The glidelock clasp is nice to have also.

Offline chrisyen

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5959
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2015, 09:11:54 PM »
Ceramic for 100%
Newer the better

The pre c bracelet jus too flimsy
Aluminium bezel insert also outdated, fragile!

Unless those well preserved vintage sub
Which carry some history value


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline nikfs1881

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 425
  • "Time is the most valuable thing a man can spend."
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2015, 01:04:09 AM »

Ceramic for 100%
Newer the better

The pre c bracelet jus too flimsy
Aluminium bezel insert also outdated, fragile!

Unless those well preserved vintage sub
Which carry some history value


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fully agree with every word chris said!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rolex Sea-dwellerC|Breitling Seawolf Blacksteel LE|Tag heuer Grand Carrera|Chopard Monaco Historique Time Attack|Baume et Mercier Capeland|Tudor Grantour|Omega Seamaster|Oris Artix Complication|Rolex 6694|Tag Heuer Link|Oris William F1|Tag Heuer 2000|Tissot T-Race LE|Rado D-Star 200 |Sistem51|Longines Hydroconquest Chrono|Seiko SRP577|Seiko SBDC003|Steinhart GMT Pepsi & Nav B44| Nomos Tangente 38

Offline TannaLR

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2019, 08:15:13 AM »
Sub C two tone for me ! 116613LN in black.
Age - 28

Offline cheesycake7

  • Freshie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #12 on: September 04, 2019, 01:13:04 PM »
Sub-c for me too. Age: 29

Offline axaxax

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #13 on: September 05, 2019, 10:15:00 PM »
one solution to the pre ceramic flimsy bracelet is to swap for a Rubber B. it makes the watch understated while drawing 2nd look from curious eyes.

Offline nelson_ling

  • Freshie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: Rolex Submariner Pre-ceramic vs SubC: Age Demographic
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2019, 03:38:37 PM »
25

Currently having Tudor BB58, cause purchasing Sub in impossible in AD these days.

However, I prefer aluminium bezel over the ceramics, so I’ll choose 14060M


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk