Author Topic: 2016 IWC Mark XVIII is now smaller at 40mm, what do you think? (Read 24710 times)

asimo · « **Reply #50 on:** June 17, 2016, 12:55:02 PM »

Most of the luxury brand watches put high price in their entry level despite non inhouse be it panerai , omega, Cartier , brietling , B&R...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Cocas · « **Reply #51 on:** June 17, 2016, 01:47:18 PM »

Then Rolex is better and sincere, to be exact is reputable because its entry or basic level watch still using inhouse movement.

asimo · « **Reply #52 on:** June 17, 2016, 03:35:57 PM »

Quote from: Cocas on June 17, 2016, 01:47:18 PM

Then Rolex is better and sincere, to be exact is reputable because its entry or basic level watch still using inhouse movement.

Agreed with you, and they use high grade 904L steel even entry level watches (start from rm20k for a Oyster perpetual), and it come with a robust inhouse movement (and proprietary innovations ). And the maintenance cost is Comparable with other luxury watch brands.

Certain luxury brands give non inhouse movement even though cost above rm20k!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dualcarb · « **Reply #53 on:** June 17, 2016, 03:42:38 PM »

Quote from: asimo on June 17, 2016, 03:35:57 PM

Quote from: Cocas on June 17, 2016, 01:47:18 PM
Then Rolex is better and sincere, to be exact is reputable because its entry or basic level watch still using inhouse movement.

Agreed with you, and they use high grade 916L steel even entry level watches (start from rm20k for a Oyster perpetual), and it come with a robust inhouse movement. And the maintenance cost is Comparable with other luxury watch brands.

Certain luxury brands give non inhouse movement even though cost above rm20k!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree with the both of you. Rolex is the only brand amongst Omega, Panerai and the likes which uses third party (ETA) movement on some of their pieces. Rolex also does not milk the market by offering "limited edition" or "special edition" watches. A Rolex is a Rolex and is as honest as day with in house everything.

elado249 · « **Reply #54 on:** June 17, 2016, 03:49:46 PM »

Totally agree, even tho i do not own any rolex. Hopefully in years coming rolex will introduce exhibition back, then i can fully enjoy the watch

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

asimo · « **Reply #55 on:** June 17, 2016, 05:18:14 PM »

So no forum members bought the new Mark XVIII ? The LPP blue version looks good , 2nd is the white dial ... Wonder it is the first time IWC come out with white dial pilot watches ?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dualcarb · « **Reply #56 on:** June 17, 2016, 06:43:20 PM »

Quote from: asimo on June 17, 2016, 05:18:14 PM

So no forum members bought the new Mark XVIII ? The LPP blue version looks good , 2nd is the white dial ... Wonder it is the first time IWC come out with white dial pilot watches ?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No budget right now. I love the blue on the LPP though...unless I let go of some pieces, but I am rather reluctant to do that at the moment.

asimo · « **Reply #57 on:** June 17, 2016, 09:27:45 PM »

Read someone mentioned in a western watch forum that the New Mark XVIII actually USD1k cheaper than the XVII .. But in Malaysia XVIII is more expensive by RM1K at RM18.4K

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

watchdiver · « **Reply #58 on:** June 17, 2016, 11:44:56 PM »

Quote from: asimo on June 17, 2016, 09:27:45 PM

Read someone mentioned in a western watch forum that the New Mark XVIII actually USD1k cheaper than the XVII .. But in Malaysia XVIII is more expensive by RM1K at RM18.4K

Where did you read this? Sounds interesting.

elado249 · « **Reply #59 on:** June 18, 2016, 05:03:27 AM »

I do read that IWC lowered their price for this model, but i think its typical malaysian retailer/ad way

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

asimo · « **Reply #60 on:** June 18, 2016, 07:31:45 AM »

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f408/gone-60-seconds-iwc-pilot%92s-watch-mark-xviii-video-review-2830210.html#/forumsite/20758/topics/2750578?page=5

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

asimo · « **Reply #61 on:** June 18, 2016, 07:34:06 AM »

http://www.ablogtowatch.com/iwc-pilots-watch-mark-xviii/

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

asimo · « **Reply #62 on:** June 18, 2016, 07:35:10 AM »

Quote from: elado249 on June 18, 2016, 05:03:27 AM

I do read that IWC lowered their price for this model, but i think its typical malaysian retailer/ad way

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

But in Malaysia, the official retail price increase from rm17.4k to rm18.4k for Mark 18

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

roystock · « **Reply #63 on:** June 20, 2016, 06:10:13 PM »

I tried the mark xviii today, side by side with a xvii.
Surprisingly, the date window doesn't bother me and I sure prefer the size to mark xvii.
However, the watch doesn't wear well on me due to the design of its lug which is a little long for my liking.

I guess it is time to look out for a xvi

ilovehotdogss · « **Reply #64 on:** June 22, 2016, 06:26:46 PM »

A great piece but why 40mm now??

spacewalker · « **Reply #65 on:** February 14, 2018, 05:12:17 PM »

Quote from: roystock on June 20, 2016, 06:10:13 PM

I tried the mark xviii today, side by side with a xvii.
Surprisingly, the date window doesn't bother me and I sure prefer the size to mark xvii.
However, the watch doesn't wear well on me due to the design of its lug which is a little long for my liking.

I guess it is time to look out for a xvi

Even it is 40mm but the lug to lug of this pilot is about 50mm. It is wear big . For me, the diamater is one thing, now I'm focusing more on the lug to lug length for better fitting for my wrist. I'd try IWC Pilot 377709 Chrono 43mm , the diameter is ok but the lug (lug to lug 53mm) had exceed my wrist. Doesn't fit me well. Any help from IWC gurus or expert in this forum is appreciate since I'm still looking for a pilot watch.

dualcarb · « **Reply #66 on:** February 15, 2018, 06:14:33 AM »

Does the watch have to have a chrono function? Why particularly a pilot’s watch? If it’s a simple three hand watch that you want, the IWC mark series now comes in 36mm too. But I would also highly recommend the Omega Speedmaster professional. It may have a 42mm dimension but wears smaller. Highly versatile and looks great with both the steel and whatever bracelet that you throw it on. I know it’s not a pilot’s watch, but it’s a “space watch”.

spacewalker · « **Reply #67 on:** February 15, 2018, 02:17:14 PM »

Most of my collection is diver watch. Got bore with bulky case , thick bezel, and round hour marker. I kinda like the simplicity pilot watch.It doesn't have to be chrono. Must be white arabic numerial , black dial , leather strap, flat sapphire and diameter 40-41mm. That's it. I have the B&R steel 03-92 and want to add some more pilot watch. Omega seem to be over my budget. I'd eyeing the Longines Avigation Bigeye Chrono, will check it out next week. The IWC Portofino also catch my eye, anyone here can pm me the best deal /discount for IWC.

kukujiao · « **Reply #68 on:** February 16, 2018, 02:52:20 PM »

iwc pilot chrono is more worth buying

Sent from my VKY-L29 using Tapatalk

dualcarb · « **Reply #69 on:** February 17, 2018, 05:34:01 AM »

Quote from: spacewalker on February 15, 2018, 02:17:14 PM

Most of my collection is diver watch. Got bore with bulky case , thick bezel, and round hour marker. I kinda like the simplicity pilot watch.It doesn't have to be chrono. Must be white arabic numerial , black dial , leather strap, flat sapphire and diameter 40-41mm. That's it. I have the B&R steel 03-92 and want to add some more pilot watch. Omega seem to be over my budget. I'd eyeing the Longines Avigation Bigeye Chrono, will check it out next week. The IWC Portofino also catch my eye, anyone here can pm me the best deal /discount for IWC.

This is the review on one of the watch sites for the IWC 36mm pilots.
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/new-iwc-pilots-watch-automatic-36mm

I’m sure you would be able to purchase it for around RM 12,000 if you looked around for a bit.

maxthecat80 · « **Reply #70 on:** February 17, 2018, 07:02:51 AM »

Personally, i like the smaller size but I have to admit, fliegers have to be big though..

Biggest difference is the red arrow at the triple date window. This divides opinion, i know.. some hate it as its not really 'flieger' per se, but i think it adds aviator feel to the whole watch...

Plus if you are spending 10k+, it needs to be different. Otherwise on a simple ETA, might as well get Stowa/Laco?

sidestreaker · « **Reply #71 on:** March 28, 2018, 11:15:19 AM »

Waited since SIHH 2016 for the right Pilot watch to appear and my patience paid off. The Mark 18 Heritage Titanium just works IMO. Managed to find an OEM leather studded strap for this size to give that mini bigpilot look

Caseywai · « **Reply #72 on:** April 02, 2018, 10:26:20 AM »

Quote from: sidestreaker on March 28, 2018, 11:15:19 AM

Waited since SIHH 2016 for the right Pilot watch to appear and my patience paid off. The Mark 18 Heritage Titanium just works IMO. Managed to find an OEM leather studded strap for this size to give that mini bigpilot look

Wow it looks very nice with the aged liked lume. Matches nicely with the strap!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kukujiao · « **Reply #73 on:** April 02, 2018, 11:22:04 AM »

I think the pilot chrono best size is 42mm not 43mm

Sent from my VKY-L29 using Tapatalk

jacobng · « **Reply #74 on:** April 03, 2018, 10:56:04 AM »

Quote from: sidestreaker on March 28, 2018, 11:15:19 AM

Waited since SIHH 2016 for the right Pilot watch to appear and my patience paid off. The Mark 18 Heritage Titanium just works IMO. Managed to find an OEM leather studded strap for this size to give that mini bigpilot look

Where did you buy this strap ?

Need the link !

News:

Author Topic: 2016 IWC Mark XVIII is now smaller at 40mm, what do you think? (Read 24710 times)