Author Topic: Panerai Complete PAM Numbers Mook  (Read 3895 times)

Offline TheHobbit

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3328
Panerai Complete PAM Numbers Mook
« on: August 25, 2013, 02:47:51 PM »
I got this today and it makes a good go to reference guide to the models Panerai have issued since 1997 to 2013. It is not complete, it is in Japanese but there are lots of photographs and it is 300+ pages thick. Not sure what it will cost in Malaysia but it is about USD 50. There are sections covering Panerai history, vintage pieces, Panerai equipment, and the watches Panerai have issued. You can order this at your local Japanese bookstore.

Panerai Complete PAM Numbers
ISBN 978-4-418-13222-5























Offline Spider boy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
Re: Panerai Complete PAM Numbers Mook
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2013, 03:16:05 PM »
fantastic information for pam lovers  :thumbsup:. I am going to osaka sep. hopefully will be able to find a copy of that in the local book store .. 

Offline bezelnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 807
Re: Panerai Complete PAM Numbers Mook
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2013, 03:27:01 PM »


Somehow this Pam look like the GP three bridge.


Offline chrisyen

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5959
Re: Panerai Complete PAM Numbers Mook
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2013, 04:47:38 PM »


Somehow this Pam look like the GP three bridge.



this 3 golden bridges tourbillon movement made by GP ....


Offline TheHobbit

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3328
Re: Panerai Complete PAM Numbers Mook
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2013, 06:55:21 PM »


Somehow this Pam look like the GP three bridge.



this 3 golden bridges tourbillon movement made by GP ....

The movement is indeed the 3 golden bridges by GP. It is the caliber 9907. Only 2 made and both were sold by Antiquorum.

Offline bezelnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 807
Re: Panerai Complete PAM Numbers Mook
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2013, 07:39:24 PM »
I see. Thats explain the resemblance.

Thank you both for explaining.